Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGunasinghe, Tasha
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-22T16:07:10Z
dc.date.available2023-02-22T16:07:10Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10464/17432
dc.description.abstractWithin Canada, active strives are being made to achieve Canada’s Target 1 conservation goal. The creation of area-based conservation methods such as Other Effective Conservation Measures (OECMs) and Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas (IPCAs), provide the means to achieve these goals. However, the current screening tools used to identify and monitor OECMs and IPCAs heavily reflect exclusively western science, thereby creating barriers for Indigenous nations. This research uses the collaborative framework of Two- Eyed Seeing to identify potential criteria indicators that are inclusive of Indigenous traditional knowledge to assess the governance systems, cultural and spiritual outcomes, and conservation outcomes of IPCAs. A rapid literature review was conducted to analyze the current screening metrics used by the Canadian government which revealed the potential for criteria for monitoring metrics. This paper highlights the need for place-based conservation management, co-governance models and wellness indicators in current monitoring tools for OECMs and IPCAs.en_US
dc.subjectIndigenous Protected and Conserved Areas (IPCAs)en_US
dc.subjectOther Effective Conservation Measures (OECMs)en_US
dc.subjectIndigenous led conservationen_US
dc.subjectCanada’s Target 1en_US
dc.titleExploring Collaborative Frameworks to Assess and Monitor Conservation Outcomes of Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas (IPCAs)en_US
refterms.dateFOA2023-02-22T16:07:11Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Brock_Gunasinghe_Tasha_2022.pdf
Size:
422.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record