Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorSodergren, Steven E.
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-31T19:25:10Z
dc.date.available2016-05-31T19:25:10Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationArmstrong MJ, Sodergren SE. 2015. “Refighting Pickett’s Charge: mathematical modeling of the Civil War battlefield”. Social Science Quarterly 96 #4, 1153–1168.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10464/9359
dc.description.abstractObjective. We model Pickett’s Charge at the Battle of Gettysburg to see whether the Confederates could have achieved victory by committing more infantry, executing a better barrage, or facing a weaker defense. Methods. Our mathematical modeling is based on Lanchester equations, calibrated using historical army strengths. We weight the Union artillery and infantry two different ways using two sources of data, and so have four versions of the model. Results. The models estimate that a successful Confederate charge would have required at least 1 to 3 additional brigades. An improved artillery barrage would have reduced these needs by about 1 brigade. A weaker Union defense could have allowed the charge to succeed as executed. Conclusions. The Confederates plausibly had enough troops to take the Union position and alter the battle’s outcome, but likely too few to further exploit such a success.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectMilitary historyen_US
dc.subjectAmerican Civil Waren_US
dc.subjectOperations researchen_US
dc.subjectLanchester equationsen_US
dc.titleRefighting Pickett’s Charge: mathematical modeling of the Civil War battlefielden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record