Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDwivedi, Veena D.
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-02T18:18:24Z
dc.date.available2014-01-02T18:18:24Z
dc.date.issued2013-11
dc.identifier.citationDwivedi VD (2013) Interpreting Quantifier Scope Ambiguity: Evidence of Heuristic First, Algorithmic Second Processing. PLoS ONE 8(11): e81461. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081461en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10464/5161
dc.description.abstractThe present work suggests that sentence processing requires both heuristic and algorithmic processing streams, where the heuristic processing strategy precedes the algorithmic phase. This conclusion is based on three self-paced reading experiments in which the processing of two-sentence discourses was investigated, where context sentences exhibited quantifier scope ambiguity. Experiment 1 demonstrates that such sentences are processed in a shallow manner. Experiment 2 uses the same stimuli as Experiment 1 but adds questions to ensure deeper processing. Results indicate that reading times are consistent with a lexical-pragmatic interpretation of number associated with context sentences, but responses to questions are consistent with the algorithmic computation of quantifier scope. Experiment 3 shows the same pattern of results as Experiment 2, despite using stimuli with different lexicalpragmatic biases. These effects suggest that language processing can be superficial, and that deeper processing, which is sensitive to structure, only occurs if required. Implications for recent studies of quantifier scope ambiguity are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPLoSen_US
dc.titleInterpreting Quantifier Scope Ambiguity: Evidence of Heuristic First, Algorithmic Second Processingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record