• Login
    View Item 
    •   Repository Home
    • Brock Theses
    • Masters Theses
    • M.A. Political Science
    • View Item
    •   Repository Home
    • Brock Theses
    • Masters Theses
    • M.A. Political Science
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Corporal punishment : understanding the debate in Canada

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Brock_McIntyre_2004.pdf (30.13Mb)
    Date
    2004-11-04
    Author
    McIntyre, Heather.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    There has been considerable debate over whether corporal punishment against children should be prohibited in Canada. Various organizations, most notably the Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law, have argued that the Canadian Government should ban the use of corporal punishment by repealing the specific section of the Canadian Criminal Code that provides parents with a legal defence to use corporal punishment against their children; this provision is outlined in Section 43 of the Criminal Code. Recently, the Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law challenged the constitutionality of Section 43 before the Supreme Court of Canada. The organization claimed Section 43 is unconstitutional. It violates children's Charter rights, such as the right to security of a person (Section 7), the right to be protected from cruel and unusual treatment (Section 12), and denies children the same protection adults receive under the law. Both the Canadian government and the Supreme Court of Canada reject the Foundation's arguments. Examining the federal government and the judicial system's rationale for refusing to remove Section 43 of the Canadian Criminal Code discloses how the parent-child relationship is perceived. This thesis examines how the parent-child relationship is perceived by the Canadian government and the issues that arise from such a view. This examination is essential for the comprehension of why Canada's corporal punishment law was enacted and remains in effect today.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10464/2786
    Collections
    • M.A. Political Science

    Brock University | Copyright © 2006-2015 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Brock University | Copyright © 2006-2015 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback