| dc.description.abstract |
This study was undertaken to investigate any textual differences and
similarities within essays written with a word processing program and an e-mail
editor by non-native writers. It arose from many contradictions and a paucity of
empirical research within the field of second language learning and electronic
technology. To further explore these contradictory observations, 3 classes of
intermediate level ESL (English as a Second Language) students v^ote 6
essays, alternating between a word processing program and an e-mail editor.
Prior to the data collection, students read brief texts and responded to questions
that focused upon three formal topics: immigration, economics, and
multiculturalism. Data were examined for (a) the differences in the frequency
counts of 12 cohesive devices, (b) sentence complexity, which focused upon the
occurrences of simple and complex sentences, (c) the number of words within
the writings, (d) the method of contextualization preferred by writers, and (e) any
variations in the final grades of the students' texts that resulted from holistic
rating. Results of analysis indicated that there were no statistically significant
differences in the frequency counts of the linguistic features. Sentence
complexity did not vary within the off-line and on-line essays. The average
number of words found within the off-line essays was approximately 20% greater
than within on-line essays. Contextualization methods were not different within
word-processed or e-mailed essays. Finally, there was no difference in the
quality of the texts when holistically rated. |
en_US |