Abstract:
This study examined factors contributing to the differences in left ventricular mass as
measured by Doppler echocardiography in children. Fourteen boys (10.3 ± 0.3 years of
age) and 1 1 girls (10.5 ± 0.4 years of age) participated in the study.
Height and weight were measured, and relative body fat was determined from the
measurement of skinfold thickness according to Slaughter et al. (1988). Lean Body Mass
was then calculated by subtracting the fat mass from the total body mass. Sexual
maturation was self-assessed using the stages of sexual maturation by Tanner (1962).
Both pubic hair development and genital (penis or breast for boys and girls respectively)
development were used to determine sexual maturation. Carotid Pulse pressure was
assessed by applanation tomometry in the left carotid artery. Cardiac mass was measured
by Doppler Echocardiography. Images of cardiac structures were taken using B-Mode
and were then translated to M- Mode. The dimensions at the end diastole were obtained
at the onset of the QRS complex of the electrocardiogram in a plane through a standard
position. Measurements included: (a) the diameter of the left ventricle at the end diastole
was measured from the septum edge to the endocardium mean border, (b) the posterior
wall was measured as the distance from to anterior wall to the epicardium surface, and (c)
the interventricular septum was quantified as the distance from the surface of the left
ventricle border to the right ventricle septum surface. Systolic time measurements were
taken at the peak of the T-wave of the electrocardiogram. Each measurement was taken
three to five times before averaging. Average values were used to calculate cardiac mass
using the following equation (Deveraux et al. 1986). Weekly physical activity metabolic equivalent was calculated using a standardize activity questionnaire (Godin and Shepard,
1985) and peakV02 was measured on a cycloergometer.
There were no significant differences in cardiovascular mesurements between
boys and girls. Left ventricular mass was correlated (p<0.05) with size, maturation,
peakV02 and physical activity metabolic equivalent. In boys, lean body mass alone
explained 36% of the variance in left ventricular mass while weight was the single
strongest predictor of left ventricular mass (R =0.80) in girls. Lean body mass, genital
developemnt and physical activity metabolic equivalent together explained 46% and 81%
in boys and girls, respectively. However, the combination of lean body mass, genital
development and peakV02 (ml kgLBM^ min"') explained up to 84% of the variance in left
ventricular mass in girls, but added nothing in boys.
It is concluded that left ventricular mass was not statistically different between
pre-adolescent boys and girls suggesting that hormonal, and therefore, body size changes
in adolescence have a main effect on cardiac development and its final outcome.
Although body size parameters were the strongest correlates of left ventricular mass in
this pre-adolescent group of children, to our knowledge, this is the first study to report
that sexual maturation, as well as physical activity and fitness, are also strong associated
with left ventricular mass in pre-adolescents, especially young females. Arterial
variables, such as systolic blood pressure and carotid pulse pressure, are not strong
determinants of left ventricular mass in this pre-adolescent group. In general, these data
suggest that although there is no gender differences in the absolute values of left
ventricular mass, as children grow, the factors that determine cardiac mass differ between
the genders, even in the same pre-adolescent age.