Abstract:
In this thesis, three main questions were addressed using event-related potentials
(ERPs): (1) the timing of lexical semantic access, (2) the influence of "top-down"
processes on visual word processing, and (3) the influence of "bottom-up" factors on
visual word processing. The timing of lexical semantic access was investigated in two
studies using different designs. In Study 1,14 participants completed two tasks: a
standard lexical decision (LD) task which required a word/nonword decision to each
target stimulus, and a semantically primed version (LS) of it using the same category of
words (e.g., animal) within each block following which participants made a category
judgment. In Study 2, another 12 participants performed a standard semantic priming
task, where target stimulus words (e.g., nurse) could be either semantically related or
unrelated to their primes (e.g., doctor, tree) but the order of presentation was randomized.
We found evidence in both ERP studies that lexical semantic access might occur early
within the first 200 ms (at about 170 ms for Study 1 and at about 160 ms for Study 2).
Our results were consistent with more recent ERP and eye-tracking studies and are in
contrast with the traditional research focus on the N400 component.
"Top-down" processes, such as a person's expectation and strategic decisions,
were possible in Study 1 because of the blocked design, but they were not for Study 2
with a randomized design. Comparing results from two studies, we found that visual
word processing could be affected by a person's expectation and the effect occurred early
at a sensory/perceptual stage: a semantic task effect in the PI component at about 100 ms
in the ERP was found in Study 1 , but not in Study 2. Furthermore, we found that such "top-down" influence on visual word processing might be mediated through separate
mechanisms depending on whether the stimulus was a word or a nonword.
"Bottom-up" factors involve inherent characteristics of particular words, such as
bigram frequency (the total frequency of two-letter combinations of a word), word
frequency (the frequency of the written form of a word), and neighborhood density (the
number of words that can be generated by changing one letter of an original word or
nonword). A bigram frequency effect was found when comparing the results from
Studies 1 and 2, but it was examined more closely in Study 3. Fourteen participants
performed a similar standard lexical decision task but the words and nonwords were
selected systematically to provide a greater range in the aforementioned factors. As a
result, a total of 18 word conditions were created with 18 nonword conditions matched on
neighborhood density and neighborhood frequency. Using multiple regression analyses,
we foimd that the PI amplitude was significantly related to bigram frequency for both
words and nonwords, consistent with results from Studies 1 and 2. In addition, word
frequency and neighborhood frequency were also able to influence the PI amplitude
separately for words and for nonwords and there appeared to be a spatial dissociation
between the two effects: for words, the word frequency effect in PI was found at the left
electrode site; for nonwords, the neighborhood frequency effect in PI was fovind at the
right elecfrode site. The implications of otir findings are discussed.