Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBendus, Victoria
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-13T20:20:37Z
dc.date.available2017-09-13T20:20:37Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10464/12985
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the study was to compare and contrast the effectiveness of a traditional maximal strength (MS) training protocol with a maximal strength and electrostimulation (MSES) training regimen on lower body strength, sprinting time, and on ice skating times. Fifteen male (21.5 ± 1.5 years) and 13 female (18.5 ± 3.3 years) competitive ice hockey players were recruited from Midget AA, Junior B, Senior A, and collegiate teams. Participants were stratified by sex and randomized into two groups prior to completing a crossover training study consisting of two 4-week, 8-session training interventions: MS/MSES and MSES/MS. On and off ice assessment batteries were performed at three time points: Pre, Post 1 (week 4), and Post 2 (week 8). Lower body strength was assessed using vertical jump (VJ; cm), horizontal jump (HJ; cm), and one repetition maximum deadlift (DL; kg) and front squat (FS; kg) measures. Sprinting time was assessed using a 20-m sprint (s) and skating times were assessed using five skating drills measuring two-step acceleration and total times (s). Primary 2 (sequence) x 3 (time; Pre, Post 1, Post 2) repeated measures analyses of variance (RM-ANOVA) were conducted to determine if significant differences existed between training sequences (p<.05). Secondary 2 (sequence) x 2 (time; Pre, Post 1) RM-ANOVAs were conducted to determine if significant differences existed between MS and MSES interventions at Post 1. Significant 2 x 3 interactions were revealed for the VJ and stop/start left drill, however no significant differences were evident between sequences at Post 1 or Post 2. Significant main effects of time (groups collapsed) were revealed for the HJ, DL, FS, and combination drill that indicated significant improvement from Pre to Post 2. Significant 2 x 2 interactions were revealed for the VJ, FS, and stop/start right drill, however there were no significant differences between sequences at Post 1. Two of the seventeen variables assessed revealed significant differences between training sequences and four were significantly different between MS and MSES at Post 1. Five RM’s confirmed that significant improvements were demonstrated in strength over 8 weeks of training, however strength increases did not transfer to improvements in sprint or skating times.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBrock Universityen_US
dc.subjecttraining, strength, electrostimulationen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Maximal Strength Training versus Maximal Strength and Electrostimulation Training on Lower Body Strength, Sprinting Time, and Skating Timesen_US
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertationen_US
dc.degree.nameM.Sc. Applied Health Sciencesen_US
dc.degree.levelMastersen_US
dc.contributor.departmentApplied Health Sciences Programen_US
dc.degree.disciplineFaculty of Applied Health Sciencesen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record