| dc.description.abstract |
One hundred and five primarily Caucasian undergraduate couples were tested to
study the phenomenon of attitude alignment, or the way in which individuals change their
opinions to achieve greater attitudinal congruence with their romantic partners, and the
hypotheses that relationship closeness, affect, attachment, social desirability, and
centrality are each related to attitude alignment for individuals in close couples. The
couples filled out an attitude questionnaire consisting of 50 issues in which they were
asked to give their attitude on a scale from 1 to 9 as well as to rate the centrality, or
importance, of that issue on a scale from 1 to 9. Before discussing four of these issues
with each other - 2 were more central to the man and less central, or peripheral, to the
woman, whereas the other 2 were central to the woman and peripheral to the man - the
individuals completed established measures of relationship closeness, affect, attachment,
and social desirability. The couples then filled out the identical attitudes questionnaire
again, and their answers on the four discussion issues were compared to their prediscussion
answers to determine whether attitude alignment had occurred. There were
two experimental groups: a social desirability group, where the couples were told it was
natural and normal to disagree with their partners, and a control group. Results indicated
that attitude alignment did significantly occur across all couples, but most other variables
- including centrality, relationship closeness, and affect - did not predict attitude
alignment behaviour. As well, the social desirability experimental groups did not
significantly differ on attitude alignment behaviours, but higher scores on the social
desirability scale, specifically self-deception, significantly predicted higher attitude
alignment scores across all couples. Large differences between individuals' frequency. |
en_US |